Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

External vs internal implant : °¢°¢ÀÇ ÀåÁ¡°ú °í·Á»çÇ×

External vs internal connection implant system

´ëÇÑÄ¡°úÀÇ»çÇùȸÁö 2016³â 54±Ç 3È£ p.184 ~ 190
¼Ò¼Ó »ó¼¼Á¤º¸
¼ºµ¿Àç:Seong Dong-Jae È«¼ºÁø:Hong Seoung-Jin/ÇϽ·æ:Ha Seung-Ryong

Abstract


The osseointegration of titanium implants has been examined over the past 50 years. Many implant systems have been
introduced and have become popular to the implant dentistry. The designs of the connection between implant fixture and abutment are divided into external vs internal connection. From beginning, the Branemark system was characterized by an external hexagon. Internal connection has been developed to reduce stress transferred to the bone. These differences may have impact on the clinical procedures and protocols, laboratory and components costs, and incidence of complications. Therefore, the clinician has to know the different biomechanical features and understand their implications to produce successful implant-supported prosthesis with an external or an internal connection system.

Å°¿öµå

Dental implant-abutment design; External connection; Internal connection; Dental implants; Dental prosthesis

¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸

 

µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸

KCI